Saturday, April 17, 2021
Home » National » World powers take notice of the worst violations of human rights in occupied Kashmir:FO

World powers take notice of the worst violations of human rights in occupied Kashmir:FO

Nafees Zakaria

Chaudhry Ahsan Premee

Associated Press Service

December 15, 2016

Foreign Office spokesman said in opening remarks during the weekly press briefing that since we met last week, genocide and crimes against humanity committed by Indian occupation forces in IOK claimed more precious lives of Kashmiris. We strongly condemn martyrdom of innocent Kashmiris. Kashmiris’ right to freedom of expression, religious practice, and freedom of movement remained curbed under Indian oppressive measures, which is highly deplorable.

He added that questions have been constantly raised by many among you on the silence of the international community over Indian worst human rights violations in IOK. I had said that civil society members in various regions, joined by the Members Parliament and members of Kashmiri and Pakistani Diaspora have held numerous events to sensitise the International Community on the blatant violations of human rights in IOK, availing the occasion of human rights day and on other days.

He added that Rochdale Borough Council while expressing their concern over grave human rights violations, urged the UN and Int’l HR bodies to protect, monitor and human rights in IOK. The Council noted that the genocide committed by Indian forces in IOK is designed to curb pro-freedom voices and Kashmiris’ right to self-determination enshrined in several UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir. The Council observed that the voice of Kashmiris is challenging India and world’s conscience. The Council condemned Indian Government’s statements on unilateral abrogation of the Indus Water Treaty.

He added that Lord Qurban Hussain of Luton raised question on 12 Dec. in the House of Lords, ‘What steps Her Majesty’s Government is taking to support the UN investigations into human rights abuses in Indian occupied Kashmir?’ Baroness Goldie responded that UK was concerned and supports prompt, transparent and thorough investigation and UK also supports enabling of UN Bodies to fulfill their mandates. She confirmed that British PM Theresa May took up the issue of Kashmir with PM Modi during her recent visit. On Human Rights Day, a large number of British Parliamentarians raised their deep concerns over Indian atrocities in IOK.

SAPM Tariq Fatemi, who is on visit to the US and Pakistan’s Ambassadors in various countries have effectively raised the issue of ongoing brutalities in IOK and Kashmir dispute.

 Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that both of you have asked almost similar questions. As for the first question, the international community is deeply concerned about treatment of minorities in India. Muslims, Dalits and Christians are especially victims of Hindu extremist and terrorist organizations such as RSS, Shiv Sena, Abhinav Bharat, etc. International Community is witnessing worst human rights violations and persecution of minorities, particularly of Muslims, in India.  I also recall one report in which it was stated that in the last couple of years, more than 200 churches have been burnt down by the Hindu extremists and terrorists in India.

As to your second question, Interior Minister has responded very comprehensively in this regard. Let me add that we strongly condemn the absurd remarks of the Indian Home Minister which are in complete violation of all diplomatic norms, UN Charter and other international instruments guaranteeing sovereignty and territorial integrity of states. These remarks vindicate Pakistan’s long standing position that Indian government and its intelligence agencies are involved in subversive and terrorist activities and terror financing in Pakistan to fuel tension and destabilize the country. The international community must take notice of such irresponsible statements and Indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that UNMOGIP was constituted under a UN Security Council resolution to observe, to the extent possible, developments pertaining to the strict observance of the ceasefire line and to report thereon to the UN Secretary-General.

Pakistan therefore regularly facilitates the UNMOGIP in the performance of its responsibilities. On various occasions of ceasefire violations, Pakistan has taken UNMOGIP to the affected area.  Unfortunately India doesn’t allow the same on their side.

We welcome the call by Jose Ramos-Horta and believe that it is a preliminary step in the right direction. Pakistan’s principled position has consistently been that Jammu & Kashmir dispute should be resolved through a free and fair plebiscite under the UN auspices in line with the UN Security Council resolutions.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that I have seen the reports, but we have not received any such proposal yet. Once a request is received, we will process it according to our regulations and procedures.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that first of all, as I have said many times, we welcome all offers by various members of international community as well as the UN Secretary General to help mediate the Kashmir dispute between Pakistan and India. We welcomed all these offers because Pakistan believes that it is only through dialogue and negotiations, and following the peaceful way, that the outstanding issues can be resolved. Therefore, we have always been creating enabling atmosphere expecting India to reciprocate. Let me remind you that mediation is between two countries. As they say, it takes two to tango. Dialogue can only take place when all the parties are willing to come to the negotiating table.  For its part, Pakistan has shown necessary gestures, where warranted, to resume dialogue. International community is well aware that Pakistan has always welcomed to resolve Kashmir dispute amicably.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that the essence of your question is whether Pakistan will formally take up the issue of Kashmir with the UN Secretary General. I think it needs no elaborate mention that Pakistan has always extended full diplomatic, moral and political support to the cause of Kashmir. Pakistan has consistently highlighted the gross violations of the basic human rights of the people of IoK by Indian occupation forces on all the relevant forums. The Kashmir issue is already on the UNSC agenda. The UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir are still outstanding and remain unimplemented. We have constantly taken up this matter with the UN Secretary General, the President of UN Security Council and other UN related bodies. Our Permanent Representatives in New York and Geneva regularly take up this issue with the relevant UN authorities. This will continue until the time the aspirations of the Kashmir people in accordance with UNSC resolution are realized, which calls for plebiscite in IoK under UN auspicious.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that Gen. Nicholson’s assessment suggested that a large number of terrorist organizations are based in Afghanistan. Pakistan has taken firm action to root out terrorism through operation Zarb-e-Azab, the impact of which can be seen. This has already been acknowledged by the leadership in the US at various levels. I would like to mention the visit of Senator John McCain in which he was highly appreciative of Pakistan’s successes in counter terrorism operation. When he returned to the US he also wrote a very comprehensive article for the media in this regard.

Pakistan wants peace and stability in Afghanistan. We are engaged in border management which is imperative for effective counter terrorism. Cooperation of the Afghan Government and the US authorities has been repeatedly solicited in this regard. We look forward to receiving their support.

Let me add a few observations with reference to the Annual Assessment Report on US operations in Afghanistan, which you referred:

  • Out of 98 US designated terrorist groups around the world, around 13 are in Afghanistan.

  • US forces killed/captured 50 leaders of Al-Qaeda Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) in Afghanistan.
  • Around 200 other members of Al-Qaeda and Al-Qaeda Islamic state groups were killed/ captured in Afghanistan.
  • 5 Emirs of 20 terrorist groups were killed in Afghanistan.
  • Hamidullah, the Emir of the Islamic Jihad Union was killed in Afghanistan
  • Farouq al Qatari, Emir of eastern Afghanistan, for Al-Qaeda Islamic State was killed in Afghanistan (23 October 2016). He was Director External Operations ostensibly planning terrorist attacks in Pakistan.
  • In “Afghanistan” i) Islamic State of Khurasan (members of TTP, Islamic movement of Uzbekistan and some Members of TTA), have organized presence.

You mentioned the organized presence of Daesh in Pakistan. There is no organized presence, I repeat, no organized presence of Daesh in Pakistan. The pronouncement of one or two random individuals of having affiliation to Daesh does not form the basis for claiming organized presence for this entity in Pakistan. I wanted to share this comprehensive list (cited above), because there have been repeated queries time and again about presence of certain terrorist elements in Pakistan. I have said it in the past also that where we need to focus or look for to find the presence of those terrorists.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that I would like to address this question from the perspective of peace efforts. Pakistan has repeatedly emphasized the need for a politically negotiated settlement between the Afghan Government and the Taliban and has continuously endeavored towards this goal. In this spirit, Pakistan facilitated Murree peace talks between the afghan Government and the Taliban in July 2015. However, the breaking of news of death of Mullah Omer led to suspension of these talks. We continued our efforts and remained actively engaged in serious efforts through the QCG earlier this year. Again, the killing of Mullah Akhter Mansoor scuttled the process. Pakistan believes that Afghan conflict has to be resolved through peaceful and political means. The most apt way to move forward in this regard is serious talks between Afghan Government and the Taliban. For this, Afghan Government needs to send positive signals to the Taliban inviting them to join the peace process along with necessary incentives. In our view, an Afghan-owned and Afghan-led process is the best way and not the military option.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that first of all regarding the Murree talks, you need to see the spirit behind this. Pakistan is committed towards peace and stability in Afghanistan. We believe that peace and stability in Afghanistan is not only in the interest of Pakistan but also of the entire region. We have made sincere efforts in this regard. Our participation in Heart of Asia conference in Amritsar is a clear manifestation of this. Murree Peace talks are also another reflection of Pakistan’s commitment to see a stable and prosperous Afghanistan. It’s an altogether different thing that the Murree talks were scuttled due to the announcement of Mullah Omar’s death by someone, just before the beginning of the second round of the talks.

You also asked about the projects of Pakistan in Afghanistan. I believe that we have a list of that available on our website. But this is just one aspect of the assistance which Pakistan has given to Afghanistan which is in the shape of projects in health, education and infrastructure development sectors. We have spent US $ 500 million on these projects, and has made an additional commitment of US $ 500 million to efforts towards peace and stability in Afghanistan. Besides  this, we have been hosting for the last thirty seven years or more, an unprecedented number of Afghan refugees, and that too in some times extreme and difficult circumstances. Another aspect of this assistance is the use of Pakistan’s territory by Afghanistan for trade and other related purposes. Afghanistan is a landlocked country and Pakistan has always extended every assistance to Afghanistan in this regard. On a number of occasions in the past, there were unpaid dues of Afghanistan that related to trade transportation through Pakistan’s territory, but these were waived off by the government of Pakistan as a goodwill gesture. I think, we need to quantify all these things to see the total impact of assistance that Pakistan has so far extended to Afghanistan.

As regards the Haqqani Network, I think it is the third time that I would be saying that if you look at the statistics of Haqqani Networks’ commanders and senior leaders killed in Afghanistan from July till date, it will be sufficient for the people to realize where the Haqqani Network and its leadership actually is.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that this matter pertains to Ministry of Water & Power. You may approach them. I have seen the statement attributed to the Indus Water Commissioner, stating that a letter from the World Bank has been received and that inter-departmental consultations are on.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that Particularly since July 2016, Pakistan has consistently condemned and highlighted the gross violations of the basic human rights of the people of IoK perpetrated by India. The denial by India to allow APHC leaders to hold the Seerat UnNabi (SAWS) Conference in IoK is a blatant violation of the basic human right and religious freedom and defiance of the UN Charter. It would be better that UN Charter is read to understand how India is blatantly defying it, repeatedly.

Indian occupation forces have also consistently prevented Hurriyat leaders from offering Juma prayers since July on at least 18 to 20 different occasions. This is unacceptable according to all standards of ethics, morals and basic human rights.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that as to your second question, I am not aware of any such proposal that the Prime Minister intends to attend President-Elect Donald Trump’s oath taking ceremony.

As to your first question, the Special Assistant to the Prime Minister, who is on a visit to the U.S., has had a busy schedule and an extensive range of interactions in Washington and New York so far. More specifically, in Washington, he met Susan Rice, the U.S. National Security Advisor and Mr. Tony Blinken, Deputy Secretary of State. He also met Mr. Stephen Hadley, former National Security Advisor to President Bush and Mr. Sajid Tarrar, Founder of American Muslims for Trump. On the Hill, Mr. Fatemi met with Senator John McCain, Chairman Senate Armed Services Committee, Mr. Bob Corker, Chairman Senate Foreign Relations Committee and other members of the committee and with Congressman Eliot Engel, Ranking Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee. Besides, he has had in depth exchanges with the leading experts on the region in the Washington Think Tank community. Mr. Fatemi also interacted with senior media representatives. This provided or afforded a good opportunity to further Pakistan’s viewpoint on a number of important issues mutual interest, including the regional issues.

 Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that  unless I have seen the report I would not be able to comment on it. But I think that any such accusation is nothing but ridiculous.

Foreign Office spokesman said in response to a question that as to the first part of your question, I have already responded last time and would like to refer you to that reply. Regarding yesterday’s press release, on Pakistan-Russia bilateral consultations, it was the first meeting in the context of regional issues. • Free Website Templates - Downlaod Full Themes